Johnson v. Grants Pass
Johnson v. Grants Pass
  • Home
  • Take Action
  • Resources
    • Court Briefs
    • Rally
    • About Criminalization
    • Criminalization Tracker
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • More
    • Home
    • Take Action
    • Resources
      • Court Briefs
      • Rally
      • About Criminalization
      • Criminalization Tracker
    • Subscribe
    • Donate
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • [email protected]


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

[email protected]

  • Home
  • Take Action
  • Resources
    • Court Briefs
    • Rally
    • About Criminalization
    • Criminalization Tracker
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Johnson v. Grants Pass

Johnson v. Grants PassJohnson v. Grants PassJohnson v. Grants Pass

The Supreme Court case that made it a crime to sleep outside.

FAQ

About the Case

Grants Pass, Oregon

On April 22nd 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States heard the case of Johnson v. Grants Pass. On June 28th, a decision was announced that cities and states can arrest people for sleeping outside, even when there are no safe alternatives.


Johnson v. Grants Pass is a court case originally filed in 2018 that determined it is cruel and unusual punishment to arrest or ticket people for sleeping outside when they have no other safe place to go. The case started in Grants Pass, Oregon when the city began issuing tickets to people sleeping in public, even when there were not enough safe, accessible shelter beds.


Grants Pass, like many cities in America, is thousands of housing units short of what is needed. That shortfall will not be solved by putting more people in jail or issuing more tickets. The solution to homelessness is safe, decent, and affordable housing for everybody. 

Watch the Post-Decision Organizing Call

Frequently Asked Questions

Please reach out to Sam at the National Homelessness Law Center ([email protected]) for more details.

The Supreme Court has given cities and states across the U.S. permission to punish people who are forced to sleep outside, even when they have no other safe option. A ruling like this does nothing to end homelessness, and punishes people for existing in public simply because they have nowhere else to go. 


Studies and experience show that criminalizing homelessness only leads to more homelessness. Prohibiting acts of human survival, such as sleeping outside, is a waste of taxpayer money and actually makes it harder to connect people with housing. This ruling is a clear sign that the Supreme Court, as well as many elected officials across the political spectrum, would rather side with billionaires and make homelessness worse than simply ensure everyone is safely housed.


More than 600,000 people experience homelessness on a given night in America. Nearly half of these people—250,000—sleep outside. Homelessness is increasing across the country, as more and more hardworking households struggle to make ends meet. Rent is too expensive, wages are too low, and we have seen decades of failed housing policies. Instead of focusing on solutions like rental assistance and eviction prevention, cities and states are trying to arrest their way out of homelessness. Homelessness is caused by a lack of housing that people can afford. The solution is not court or jail, the solution is providing people with housing with services.


  • January 12th, 2024: The Supreme Court announces it will hear Johnson v. Grants Pass.
  • April 22nd: Oral arguments and in-person rally at the Supreme Court.
  • June 28th: The Supreme Court announces it is now a crime to sleep outside when no other options are available.


Jurisdictions across the country would no longer be able to criminalize people for existing when they have nowhere else to go. The expensive and evidently ineffective criminalization options would be taken off the table, and cities and states would have to focus on the true solution to homelessness: providing people with the housing and supportive resources they need.


There are many proven and data-backed solutions to homelessness, like providing people with housing and services. Arresting or otherwise punishing homeless folks is not a solution, and jails and fines make the cycle of homelessness worse. 


Cities like Miami, Milwaukee, and Houston have made tremendous progress in solving homelessness by funding housing and services. When folks have the housing and support they need, they no longer live outside. Miami, for example, was under a ruling similar to Grants Pass. Instead of seeing an increase in homelessness, while Miami was under this ruling, the city cut its homeless population in half by providing adequate housing and shelter. Again, this proves that housing is the solution to homelessness.   


Short-term solutions like shelters where everybody has their own room, regular trash pick up, and homeless outreach are also vital in solving homelessness.


Homelessness is solvable, but as long as elected officials 


Click here to read the Johnson v. Grants Pass Supreme Court opinion.


Download the full case here:

Johnson v. Grants Pass (pdf)

Download

Contact

This website is managed by the National Homelessness Law Center.

The Law Center is a team of human rights attorneys and advocates fighting to solve homelessness by challenging homelessness criminalization and protecting the rights of homeless people across the U.S.

Get in touch!

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cancel

Copyright © 2025 Johnson v. Grants Pass - All Rights Reserved.

  • Donate

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept
OSZAR »